Home : What We Do : Deterrence

DETERRENCE

The Three Kings

The Three Foundational Principles that are Essential for Deterrence in the INDO-PACIFIC

 

PROTECTION

Safeguarding the homeland, our citizens, our forces, and when required our Allies – against an evolving enemy. Our adversaries are learning and finding new ways to impose costs with both high- and low-end weapons. UNC/CFC/USFK must be a ready and adaptable shield.

 

POSTURE

 

The right capabilities at the right time and place. The Tri-Command provides strategic alignment with flexible and agile forces, including permanent, rotational, and expeditionary forces to provide optionality to America and her allies.

 

SUSTAINMENT

 

You can have the most well-armed force in the world, but if you can’t supply and maintain it, you can’t fight for long. The sheer distance in the region demands we think through how we get forces to Asia, and then how we keep them in the fight.

 

 

Authorities

AUTHORITIES: Presence and capability are insufficient without the legal and functional permissions to act; authorities activate military position to achieve policy objectives.

Authorities are the “Master Enabler”—the bridge between potential (capability) and kinetic or non-kinetic reality.

  • Agreements
  • Basing and Facilities
  • Permissions
  • Interoperability and Investment
  • Multi-Domain Force Capabilities
  • Authorities for All-Domain Operations
  • Funding and Programming for Alliance Objectives
  • Resources to Enable Regional Sustainment

“Together, we demonstrate that strength paired with collective readiness is the ultimate guardian of peace...A true fortress for all our nations and interests here in the Indo-Pacific.”

- Gen Brunson’s statement on deterrence at Land Forces Pacific Symposium and Exposition (LANPAC), May 2026
2026 NATIONAL DEFENSE STRATEGY

Korean Peninsula. With its powerful military, supported by high defense spending, a robust defense industry, and mandatory conscription, South Korea is capable of taking primary responsibility for deterring North Korea with critical but more limited U.S. support. South Korea also has the will to do so, given that it faces a direct and clear threat from North Korea. This shift in the balance of responsibility is consistent with America’s interest in updating U.S. force posture on the Korean Peninsula. In this way, we can ensure a stronger and more mutually beneficial alliance relationship that is better aligned with America’s defense priorities, thereby setting conditions for lasting peace.